LAIPLALAIPLA
LAIPLALAIPLA
  • About
    • About LAIPLA
    • Ambassador Outreach Program
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Administration
    • Member Firms and Companies
    • Past Presidents
    • Recent Past Presidents
    • Public Service Award
    • Diversity Fellowship
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Sponsorship
  • Contact
  • About
    • About LAIPLA
    • Ambassador Outreach Program
    • Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • Administration
    • Member Firms and Companies
    • Past Presidents
    • Recent Past Presidents
    • Public Service Award
    • Diversity Fellowship
    • Bylaws
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Sponsorship
  • Contact

TTABlog Collection of Section 2(b) “Flag or Other Insignia” Cases

May 29, 2019May 30, 2019| in The TTABlog| by John L. Welch
Here is a short but sweet collection of Section 2(b) cases from the TTABlog. Section 2(b) prohibits an “applicant” from registering a mark that “consists of or comprises the flag or coat of arms or other insignia of the United States, or of any State or municipality, or of any foreign nation, or any simulation thereof.” A mark barred under Section 2(b) is ineligible for registration under Section 2(f).

The “Prince of Wales decision” was vacated by the Board after the CAFC had remanded the case to the Board for consideration of new evidence. The Examining Attorney subsequently withdrew the Section 2(b) refusal. In the District of Columbia and City of Houston cases, the two entities were denied registration of their own official seals.

Section 2(b) Refusal Affirmed:

TTAB Vacates Prince of Wales Section 2(b) Decision and Remands Application to the Examining Attorney

Precedential No. 7: TTAB Affirms Section 2(b) Refusal of Mark Simulating the Prince of Wales Emblem

Precedential No. 3 = TTAB Test: Does this Mark Include a Simulation of the Swiss Flag? [Yes]

CAFC Affirms TTAB: DC and Houston Seals Properly Refused Registration Under Section 2(b)

Precedential Nos. 1 and 2: TTAB Rules that Section 2(b) Bars Registration of a Government Entity’s Own Official Insignia 

Section 2(b) Refusal Reversed:

Precedential No. 27: U.S. CUSTOMS Logo Barred by Sections 2(a) and 2(b)

TTAB Reverses 2(b) Refusal of Mark Containing Portion of Canadian Flag

Read comments and post your comment here.

Text Copyright John L. Welch 2019.

IP Blog Categories

  • Announcements
  • Events
  • LAIPLA News
  • The TTABlog
  • Uncategorized
  • Wegner's Top 10
  • Wegner's Writings

Archives

Previous

On Reconsideration, TTAB Says Settlement Agreement Calling for Abandonment of Opposed Application Is not Consent to Dismissal Without Prejudice

Next

TTABlog Test: Is EL PATRÓN Confusable with BOSS for Perfume?


Since 1934, LAIPLA has been educating and connecting members of the local intellectual property legal community

Pages

About 
Events
Membership
Sponsorship
Contact
Privacy Policy

Search
Contact

LAIPLA
1621 W 25th Street
Box 633
San Pedro, CA 90732
Phone: (323) 285-1654
Fax: ( 310) 878-0517
Email: office@laipla.net

© 2025 Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association. All Rights Reserved | Website design by Arclight Digital.

BESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswy